Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
I also do not mind criticism when it is due. And no, I don't mind the flubs being pointed out. But to let the overall show review be a message that the show was not listenable, enjoyable, etc., is where it failed, at least to me. I am not a listener who expects every review be 100% praise and fluffery. And while the author was quick to offer me the adjectives used to praise parts of the show, it is clear what the overall message was just from a simple read (and yes author, I did in fact read the entire review). Thus my message, if you can't have fun with that show, maybe you just can't have fun anymore?
My biggest worry is that the super-high expectations and not-deserved, overly critical show reviews push this band into re-thinking their audience and continued love for new music (while not neglecting the old music)...