Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
I came for a recap of the show, not to hear some couchtour three paragraph armchair opinion of how Phish should cut half their repertoire because the botched Vultures and Fee, yet the fact that they nailed Reba gets but a passing mention a moment later.
My problem is with the negative tone of the review not the fact that the reviewer pointed out the moments where the band admittedly fell flat. It was over 20 years ago where Trey said “people don’t come to the show to hear us hit all the changes” so someone has a problem with that maybe they’re not the best person to be recapping these shows on Phish.net. Sure there were flubs but for most of us they were just one aspect of a solid show capping of a legitimately GREAT run of shows.. NOT the headline or cause for a lengthy aside about how the time has come for changes.