Permalink for Comment #1376899214 by lumpblockclod

, comment by lumpblockclod
lumpblockclod @Jackaroe said:
I must be oblivious. I've been seeing Phish since the early '90s and I failed to see how they sucked in '96 (although I heard it plenty then and since) and I failed to see how they sucked this summer. Certainly you can hear in 2004 how they were ready to be done, I'll grant that. At any rate, these shows sounded hot, just like the rest of the summer did to my ears.
Interestingly, if I had to take just one year of Phish to the proverbial dessert island and my choices were limited to 1996, 2004 and 2016, I'd grab 2004 and it wouldn't even be close.
Score: 2    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19
Summer Tour 2024 Reprise 2024-09-15
The First and Last Words from Dick's 2024-09-07


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode