Before YouTube removed it earlier this week, most of the Phish community had seen a video of a Phish fan at SBIX under the influence of what appears to have been a psychoactive substance. The man was sitting cross-legged on the concert field during "Crosseyed and Painless," by himself, harming no one, and taking in the music. The person responsible for posting the video on the Internet also supplied some editorial commentary - which amounted to little more than speculation - about what was happening between the subject's ears.
I can only imagine that the purpose for posting the video was to mock and embarrass its subject, and perhaps rack up cred in the form of page views or subscribers. But I have to wonder whether the videographer considered that mockery and embarrassment may have been the least among many negative consequences this choice may have visited on his subject. What if the man's employer happened to watch the video? What if the man's significant other, or even children, happened to watch the video? It isn't hard to imagine a scenario in which seismic life consequences could have been visited on that man as a result of the videographer's decision to have a good laugh at his expense.
Let me concede this up front: nobody in 2011 has the right to expect that they can engage in any kind of unusual behavior in a random crowd of people and not wind up on YouTube. Posting a video of a stranger on YouTube is not a crime. That's the meta truth and the general context for this.
But what about at a Phish show?
How many people do you know who go to Phish shows because it's a place to feel free, and to cut loose, and to put normal workaday decorum in the fuck-it bucket for a few hours? Conversely, how many people look back on their favorite shows with a sense of gratitude that fans made sure to capture other fans engaged in behavior worthy of a little cheap ridicule? Who among us has more fun at a Phish show knowing that at any given time somebody might be capturing their behavior on film for posterity and broadcast?
This community, such as it is, has gone through plenty of ups and downs. There are factions within our subculture that don't always accord each other the utmost respect. But this candid camera bullshit - and it is worth noting that this is not the first such example - is beneath all of us. It is beneath what ought to be a common sense of dignity. None of us know the circumstances that led the man in that video to that captured moment, and many of us have moments very similar to it in our not-so-distant past. Most importantly, it bears repeating, he wasn't harming a soul.
If you can't bring yourself to respect that, at least find it within yourself to let it be.
Or stay home.
If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Bad publicity to the dude, the videographer, the fest, the fans, law enforcement, Phish......etc....etc
The big foul here, imo, occurred when the video was posted. But if not to post it, then why film it?
Cheers.
To show friends I guess. From there I am sure some of them probably convinced him it was a good idea to put it on the internet for the world to see.
The positive of this- a very negative reaction from people within the community that will possibly dissuade someone from doing this in the future. People aren't finding it funny.
Community = about the music, about the experience, about the band, about each other
Fanbase = about themselves, about looking cool, about making the funniest 2nd post, about who can find the newest way to insult one another and talk about the reasons why the band currently 'sucks'.
Ok, just my 2ยข ... getting off my soapbox now.
I love seeing all kinds of weird, intuitive, ritualistic, hoe-down dancing and the phish crowd usually brings it. Don't judge it people, just let the music in and see what happens.
If you're letting it fly in public then be prepared to show the whole world.
WHY WERE YOU LOOKING BACK BEHIND YOU AT A DUDE SITTING ON THE LAWN AND NOT AT THE STAGE DURING CROSSEYED?????????? why werent YOU dancing??!?!?!?!?
I'm sorry, but as many people, if not more, got a kick out of the video as will purport to be disgusted by it. There's no harm in that. More people that the individual behind the camera [gasp] turned around to watch this guy groove.
It's not current fanbase, it's the nature of the internet and, ultimately, the world we live in. We document everything. We post everything to the internet. If you don't want a video or picture of you wooking out posted to the internet, don't wook out in public.
Now... where's that video? I could use a good laugh.
I find it distasteful to shoot and post the material described above too, but don't expect privacy among thousands at a music festival.
Another thing, raw creativity is just that, nothing else. No additives or preservatives.
$.02
That's someone who just doesn't get it.
Did you hear that sound? It was the sound of the point soaring right over your head.
I had already conceded your observation about the nature of our digital society and what a person can reasonably expect - i.e. what you do in a crowd may be seen before a much larger crowd on the 'tronz.
But because it's possible doesn't make it right. Had you seen the video you'd likely find it thuddingly unfunny and completely unnecessary, like most others did. Or I dunno, maybe you're incapable of putting yourself in somebody else's shoes.
I'm not trying to censor anybody. I'm trying to get people to think about tradeoffs, and about what kind of atmosphere and environment they want to contribute to at Phish shows - which as I mentioned are places that people go to express themselves and feel a bit freer than they might in their regular lives.
Not that complicated.
Nobody wants this. I'm with Bertoletdown.
Re: 90's vs. current. IMO - The difference between the free spirited gatherings of the 60's, 70's 80's 90's and 00's is respect. in the 60's/70's everyone respected everyone else from the git go. True communial gatherings. One cause, one purpose. That has slowly deteriated to where we are today. It's still a great community, it still has lots of like minded people who will assist one another but...there seems to be a respect problem with a portion of the crowd. The problem is that they don't even know what the word means.
Can you video tape at a show and post someone doing something they shouldn't? Sure can, it's a free country. Should you show a stranger at a Phish show more respect then that? Your answer to that question will let you know what era you're from. Even if your 15 years old, if you get this concept then your "old school" in your ways.
The Modern Age is one of lots of animosity and the acme of the old "Holier Than Thou" bullshit.....it's lame. But we're Phisheads, we're supposed to be "different". Lets act like it!
C'mon Phans, dont hate on each other. That's lame. That's for old crusties to do.
If some jaded head is giving you shit, walk away. If some noob is crossing the "line", walk away. We're there for the music anyway, right?????
Have some fun on Leg II y'all, wish I could go!
is unrealistic for anyone to adopt that way of thinking so scratch that...
but I did come in to say that people who expect there to be ethics in the way people behave online are obviously blind to reality...
Fully participating in a Phish show is a deviant behavior in itself to most of the world (try going to almost any rock concert outside the jam scene and *gasp* standing up for the whole show). I don't buy the "why weren't these people facing the stage and rocking out instead of filming" thing because the festival experience is about all aspects of it and even at regular Phish shows I have gone away from looking at the stage to wander, people watch, whatever. I am not defending their actions but railing against these kids because they aren't experiencing the show the way someone else would is just a waste of breath IMHO.
I personally would never film something like this or post it to the interwebz but then again I also probably wouldn't lose my mind like that guy did either and if I did that in public, I wouldn't be surprised in this day and age that someone caught it on camera. These kids deserve a talking to about privacy and potential risks of posting something like this and if they don't understand it, they should be fed large doses of LSD and then followed around by a camera crew.
If you ask me, you shouldn't even WATCH someone dancing, spinning, head-bobbing, staring in stunned silence -- getting off to music in any way -- much less record it on video. And you CERTAINLY shouldn't broadcast that video to the world. That's just an unspoken agreement among humans, not to mention the Phish community. The old saying "dance like no one is watching" exists for a reason. Nothing feels better than dancing like no one's watching, especially at a Phish show. It feels like surrender. Not to sound all new-agey, but it truly feels like becoming one with the music. And if people have to look around to see if they're being watched, much less RECORDED, they'll never be able to let it loose and experience the euphoric bliss of that surrender. So ... if you've ever danced like no one's watching, and you know how great that feels ... THEN DON'T WATCH OTHER PEOPLE DANCE. Give them the same courtesy you want from them.
Everyone who is saying "This is the world we live in, he made his choice, he can't expect privacy, etc etc ..." Obviously we all know that, including the author of this post. The point is not what people are allowed to do. The point is that this community is special, and there's a certain code we all observe (or SHOULD observe) so we can all continue to have the special experience that draws us back time after time. The author is not saying it's not allowed, he's saying it's fucking reprehensible and the rest of us should do everything we can to stop it, especially if we're at a show and see it happening.
Those who say this is a symptom of the new era, I disagree. I was there in the 90s and there were douchebags then. If anything, I think the fact that Phish is somewhat declining in popularity and draws smaller crowds for the most part has made it more tolerable than the talkative, douchey crowds of the late 90s -- who were just there because they heard they could do drugs. I think a lot of that faction has gravitated to the Bonnaroos of the world because they can do the same thing while seeing Kanye West or whatever the fuck.
tl;dr: Great, great post, couldn't agree more. And let me also say that everyone responsible for the content and upkeep of this site, you are all amazing. This is, as fan polls have shown, by far and away the best Phish resource around. Thank you so much.
I haven't seen the video in question, but I have seen the video of the totally spun dude from Coachella trying to put his flips flops on, taking about 4 minutes. It's funny shit. I'm might be a heartless asshole, but if you get that spun in public, you deserve the world to laugh at you wooking out. From what it sounds like, the video in question is nothing like the one I'm talking about, but I will never know.
And if you want to talk about decency, is it ok to film someone wooking out if they're invading your personal space, getting all up in your face with their ridiculous dancing because they can't control themselves? Frankly, I say take all the video you want and post it all over the web. Maybe that'll make them think twice about taking too many drugs.
For one, I have benefited from fans using their cell phones to live stream shows on Hoodstream.
However, this trend disturbs me. I think the OP correctly characterizes this debate as an ethical one and I believe recording someone who is peacefully pursuing happiness and posting it on the internet is unethical. Or, to put it more precisely, this is a "dick move".
Sure, it's legal. It's not illegal to be a total asshole. But I don't want complete strangers posting videos of me on YouTube. Whether I'm drinking a cup of coffee at Blue Bottle, playing at the park with my kids or enjoying a psychedelic experience at Phish.
@RunawayJim: I completely relate to the experience of being around fans who have taken way too many drugs and are ruining the experience for others. For those fans, I see having their terrible behavior posted on the Internet as a type of justice. But I think you'll agree that the type of behavior we're talking about is not of this nature.
@bertoletdown said:
To the chicken shit twerp that filmed the dude peaking: You suck. You will never gain the trust of others and if perchance you do it will be unfounded. Remember the golden rule: Treat others as you would have them treat you.
I am sixteen years old, still a junior in high school, and I cannot help but draw a bold, blatant parallel between this shameless, cowardly mockery and the behavior of the social "ruling class" at my high school. Unfortunately, it seems to be an intrinsic feature of humans to want to knock others down for a short-lived ego boost, for one's sick, malicious pleasure, or in the case of many Phish fans, to get a "d00d that v1d30 i$ BR0t4LLY $3ck, brahh," from their equally pretentious friends.
I used to be picked on incessantly in school. It became a constant occurrence, and escalated to the point where I began to believe what the mockers would say about me. Just as the writer of this article points out, it is absolutely impossible to understand or even infer about the circumstances of another person, especially if you merely mock them without attempting to get to know them.
When I was introduced to Phish several years ago, I seriously admired the juxtaposition between the accepting, judgeless community that Phish had built and the unbearably cruel hierarchy that my peers had built in school. My first show was an enlightening escape, as I saw plenty of, well... "unorthodox" people that were gladly accepted by the community.
Is this kind of acceptance dwindling? I feel like every time I am inundated with another barrage of "goddamn w00k" tweets, we lose a little more of the glorious community aspect of Phish that makes the band so much more magnetic than any other band.
I am sorry I wrote so much. This just peeved me.
This ain't Vegas, baby.. OR A PERFECT WORLD.
I'd be happy if they banned all cameras at shows. No more glowing screens to impede my view.
Hey! They should make an area for people who don't care about actully watching the show. They could call it "outside".
Well said, @bertoletdown, and hat's off for generating a *mostly* intelligent discussion about community in the digital age.
"Keep what's important, and know who's your friend..."
I won't be running for president so I don't censor myself a lot but I do censor myself to some degree. Knowing that in a crowd of 30,000+ people, most of which are altered in some way, the crazier I act the more likely I am to be filmed. It is sick! It isn't right! But unfortunately it is something one has to take into consideration.
That being said, although I didn't see the video, it sounds like the guy in the video wasn't doing anything crazy. Sounds like he was keeping to himself and quietly enjoying the music in his minds eye. If he were naked, acting like a lion, etc then his filter would obviously be totally off and it would be naive for him to think his chance of being video taped would be low. But he wasn't doing that. It's sad that he couldn't depend on the community to keep him safe!
Although many employers might not care, if the man were a teacher, policeman, fireman, therapist, MD, nurse, lawyer, clergyman, etc this could easily have turned into a country wide scandal likely to be shown on the national nightly news! So this definitely could of become a huge issue for him personally. When you work in one of these professions u r constantly being watched and are held to a standard, that although unrealistic, is expected and demanded by society! It's one of the biggest reasons why I left my profession. It is also the reason that while working in such profession I had to keep my love for Phish secret. Given that Phish is such a huge part of my life it was a lot like living two lives. It sucked!
Kudos for this article! Kudos to the fan base who is outraged over this, willing to speak out, and willing to do their part to help keep their fellow Phish heads safe! And a huge kudos to YouTube for pulling the video! My only question is what caused them to pull the video? Who complained?
To answer the question about "if they are pulling videos of people doing drugs....pull the video of Trey...." the answer to that, although u may not agree, is public people (ie Trey) do not share the same assumption of privacy (especially while performing) that the ordinary public does.
When we went to the Fest 8 movie I wondered how, or if, Phish was going to protect their fans from this exact thing...except it would of been on a much bigger scale. I was very impressed that they were able to keep their fans' "recreational activities" out of the movie. It was obvious that they worked hard to make sure everyone was protected. I'm sure there were stretches of film that they wanted to use but didn't bc someone in the shot was identifiable and obviously "recreating!" They are the ones making a living off all of this...so if they can protect us then without a doubt we should be able to protect one another!
If we could just do these two simple things shit like this would never happen: 1) Do unto others as you would have them do unto you! And if you'd be ok with someone doing it to you ask yourself....would you be ok with someone doing it to your Mother, Sister, Brother, spouse, etc.? Chances are if there is even a question in your mind then the answer is DON'T DO IT! 2)Never make a descision to post a video or picture until the next morning &/or when you are sober! What seemed like a good choice at the time may be obviously a really bad choice later. It's like drunk dialing for "the year two thousand" (a la Conan O'Brien)
He was sitting on the grass in an uncrowded area, "dancing" by bopping his head, moving his hands and sticking out his tongue like a lizard as Crosseyed & Painless played, but there was no proof other than the snarky comments of the YouTube poster, that he was on LSD or similar drugs. It was pretty normal and tame, except for some bullies/asshat's deciding to film it and put it on YouTube.
It was plain and simple an invasion of privacy, in the sense that people do expect to go to a Phish show, dance like no one's looking and not turn up on YouTube under some derogatory titled video.
^^ THIS.
That said, we live in a very "connected" world. If you don't want yourself to end up on the internet, then don't do anything out of the ordinary in public (and that includes Phish shows, which are very much public). It's similar to the web. If you don't want people to see it, don't put it there to begin with.
@mpike: There is no assumption of privacy for anyone, including regular folks, like you and me, when one is in public. That includes a Phish show. Sure, Trey, being a celebrity, has no assumption of privacy when he's performing, but if you're out in public, people have a right to take a picture of you. They don't have a right to use your likeness to make money (at least not without your permission), but they do have a right to take a picture or video.
The comment about keeping our thing 'private' was interesting, especially in the context of that WSJ article about concert security. I'm sure most people, like me, laugh with glee when a newspaper incorrectly describes the band, the shows or the scene. The journal article said:
"In addition, the band's recent four-year hiatus dissipated a population of fans who followed the group everywhere. That means fewer homegrown merchantsโand drug dealersโwho lived off the tour economy."
Really? I guess the reporter didn't go to sbix, where shakedown was as huge as ever, and it wasn't particularly hard to get whatever party favor you were interested in. But that's a good thing - who wants extra scrutiny in the lots? The truth is that the culture of freedom that we notice at phish shows is partially allowed to remain due to Phish's relative obscurity. Filming tripketeers doesn't help. If someone's attempting to blow up our spot via youtube just for yucks, the best we can do is make sure people doing it in the future know it's not cool. or wait until those blurry-suits from 'a scanner darkly' are invented, which would both protect identities and look awesome at a show
I personnaly would laugh at myself but some other person may then be subject to local ridicule or harassment (say a young person getting teased about it at school), that would cause them pain, hence making the act malicious.
i hold these standards of my own voyeuristic behavior the same for anyone, celebrity (as you referenced above) or phish fan. i just hope others will do the same. i do appreciate you playing devils advocate in this and speaking valid points. i just hope 'the community' can be better than that kind of behavior. perhaps its naive or idealistic. but i think it is, or should be, another one of the great things that sets phish shows and festivals apart from others.
To finish the thought, there are plenty of rights we all have that we choose nit to exercise. It's common courtesy.
But over the last week and year, ive seen a lot of judgement for who should/shouldn't be at the show and who's opinions count/don't count and who's real/fake. And it's kind of abundant for a discussion and community based on freedom of expression and inclusion. Disagreement on a topic is healthy but drawing the guillotine on people you disagree with seems rash.
We should all be nice.
Some of us aren't.
Phish is a place to be free and enjoy yourself. No one is stopping you. But if you're that worried about a video of you just dancing being put on the web, maybe you should only dance to Phish in the privacy of your own home.
That comment is exactly what I'm talking about. Girls in $200 sundresses are not as cool as girls in vintage salvation army dress? This scene isn't exclusive.
the merits of the self-created 'community' are one thing, but actions like these seem to undermine what is commonly accepted behaviors of goodwill.
Regardless, I don't think these actions undermine anything. We welcome everyone, even those with video-taking fetishes. I also doubt anyone would lose their job over a video of them dancing at a concert unless the video shows them smoking a bowl or dropping acid or some other illicit activity (in which case, you are doing something that's against the law).
:::drops two coins:::
How awesome of you to not own a phone. Do you want a medal for that? Some of us like to share the experience with others who cannot be at the show. Does my quick texting or tweeting get in the way of you having fun? I don't think so. I'm not telling you to stop dancing. So don't tell me to stop tweeting.
Pretty simple: Do unto others..... Golden Rule.
Me. I've never once "been out of (my) tree"
jk, but I really can't understand people who want to spend the show doing this. Totally baffles me, but hey, to each their own. I have had people next to me at shows whose obsession with their device was a total drag to everyone around them, for sure. Some discreet use is fine, but some people do take it too far and it becomes a distraction for those around them.
I don't know about you, but when I'm at a show it makes a big difference to my experience whether the people surrounding me are "in the moment" and paying attention, vs focused on socializing with their friends, collecting glowsticks, watching and commenting on what other people are doing, tapping away on their phones, etc. I always just try to find an area where the focus is on the right place and the show goes much better for me.
People who crowd into rows when security kicks them out of aisle
People who wave their friends into said row without space available
Pukers
Beer spillers
Anyone who consistently hits/bumps/nudges because his "dancing" is out of control
That "foul plastic smell"
Talkers
Shouters
Conversationalists
The use of technology and electronic devices is not an issue.
always.
......for you.
to me, the proliferation of these glowing screens in my field of vision, and the growing number of people who are more focused on their screens than the stage, is an issue, along with all those other things. And don't get me wrong, I'm not about telling people what to do or not to do, but I will always insist that the quality of attention brought to the show by each and every audience member has an impact on the show. Thankfully the majority of Phish audience members are there because they love the music.
But to each their own.
Not sure what this has to do with youtube. I'm just saying'.
There's a lot of things that people think should or should not be happening. If we're supposed to live and let live we might better served to quit perseverating on the issue.
Do we even need to discuss people who sing along too loudly?
Spare me your sanctimonious rant. Spiritual yadda yadda, barf. How about you do a little more judging. Adults exhibiting childish behavior?
I have tweeted for YEMblog in the past and enjoyed the experience. Judging by the reaction, others have as well. I'm sorry that my use of technology to document my experience isn't fucking metaphysical enough for you. It's my journal and how I remember MY experience. I'm listening to music not taking the sacrament.
I am an advocate of the use of technology to share personal experiences with others. Sometimes I have to stare at someone's ugly iPhone screen when I really want to see CK5's composition. I suppose that's just the way it goes. There are worse annoyances to me at a Phish show, but I understand that for some this is a more grievous offense.
I do feel, however, that a line is crossed when a complete stranger posts a video of me to the Internet. I believe that, once we get beyond this tit for tat debate, that most of you agree.
For those that don't, I would ask you how you would feel if you (or your spouses or kids) showed up in random-stranger videos on YouTube? Would that creep you out? Would you feel in some way violated? Or are you fine with strangers following you around with cameras? If so, I hope you at least acknowledge that you are in the minority here.
Having thoroughly beat this dead horse, let's please try to treat each other with more respect. We're all attend Phish shows because we share at least one thing in common. Perhaps we can do our best to overlook our differences for the sake of the band and scene we are all a part of.
do unto others as you would have other do unto you...
ask yourself, before you do anything, would i want someone to do this to me...and if your answer is no...then don't do it...if it is "i wouldn't care"...still don't do it...because another persons dignity is not yours to take...
mean people suck! and be at phish show for phish...if you want to watch freaks...sit on the boardwalk...it's free...and let someone who gets it watch phish...or any band for that matter...
@PYITE
Have you ever had an experience at a concert that made you feel more at home or a part of something bigger than yourself and your generation? Was it more than when you had that feeling at your confirmation or what have you?
In light of these requests Phish.net will began engraving setlists from granite tablets, during the show. Please bear with us and the noise as we hammer out all of the show notes so as to provide accurate information as quickly as possible*
*please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Shipping and handling not included. Delivery outside the 48 contiguous states will incur additional costs. Sorry Canada!
[/scene]
A handful of participants in this discussion have hijacked this thread and not one of them seems content unless they have the last word*.
To this, I offer a solution: Meet up at a show and hash this out in person. I find that face-to-face encounters are rarely as venomous as they are on the semi-anonymous (and certainly less personal) Internet.
Of course, you could continue this sad and somewhat masterbaitory debate where you continually quote and pick apart each other's increasingly off-topic and childish posts. That's another option.
*Not me, of course. That would be hypocritical.
I, for one, am simply involved in a discussion. I'm not gonna apologize if you don't like the content or the tone.
Highjacked thread, hardly. The original discussion may have revolved around the youtube video but as with most discussions it has transformed.
Wherein I am not involved in a discussion or I haven't highjacked the thread? Or even there was no thread about a YouTube video?
But if perchance you are referring to my needing the last word, well, I don't believe I've denied that.
I don't think you got the joke. Which is okay. It's, like, 400 years old.
Looks like you guys are making up, though. My work here is done.
See you in Tahoe!
Well, I've been guilty of some of the "anti-technology" comments, so I'll respond to this, which I feel is a classic case of reducing the argument to an absurdity. (funny, though) Of course the internet/technology has a really positive role to play in the scene/community. But would you not admit that there is a downside? Like, why do there need to be thousands of people filming the shows on their phones, distracting those behind and around them, capturing crappy video and worse audio, when beautiful audio recordings of the whole thing will be available within hours of the show ending, and professionally filmed videos from the band released the next day? Or thousands of people tweeting and texting through the concert when it only takes a few to provide the much loved services that Phish.net provides?
Someone writing the setlist on their phone and sending it out is great. But I've been next to people who spent the ENTIRE SHOW with that little screen in their face, tapping away. The lack of attention from these people in the audience, in my opinion, is a drag to those around them, and therefore to the entire show.
For me, this discussion came around to talking about this stuff because, for me, the video in question symbolized the misplaced attention many in the audience seem to have, focusing on things other than the music.
While I completely agree with the sentiment, about how it is not cool to videotape other people, and embarrass them via the internet, I would like to point out one thing...
Chris writes:
"What if the man's employer happened to watch the video? What if the man's significant other, or even children, happened to watch the video?"
I do concur, bosses, managers, owners, et al. should have no business knowing what you do on your free time, but I do take exception to the other half of that statement.
If you put your family, personal relationships, and most importantly children, in serious jeopardy by altering your consciousness at a rock concert, maybe it's time you seriously reconsidered your responsibilities, and straightened out your priorities. But to each is own.
One love
Also, thanks to everyone for welcoming me into the community, and I cant wait to do what everyone did for me when i meet a new phan.
-Ryan
http://wapo.st/pjr3mr
/>
He wasn't charged with invasions of privacy but with computer hacking (using computer in excess of authorization, same thing that the Wiseguy Ticketmaster hackers were charged with, ironically).
The only thing new under the sun is the trend toward voyeuristic capture and dissemination into a world that may not understand and may not have sympathy. All I am asking is that people pause and consider the possible repercussions of their decisions. Not a very controversial thought.
Commenters wanted to wax poetic about what is and isn't acceptable behavior and activity during a show. Whether peripheral or not, some of that focused on the proliferation of electronic devices. I think it's hypocritical to say that being far far off in the depths of your psyche is somehow more in tune with the show than posting a tweet. Having that secondary discussion is hardly off-topic.
Ethics, community, fine. But this thread was about drugs, then technology. It's got shit to do with the guy's actions in the video. It's got everything to do with the assumption that he had ingested a hallucinogen and what those not embracing of the "let your freak flag fly" mantra might think about it since it was so easily shared through technology.
Plus, didn't this guy miss some music while he was screwing around with his camera?
Keep it underground!!!
I'm a dedicated spinner, and have been for years. I pray before every show that I do not end up on Youtube. Even though I am spinning during shows I CAN see what is going on around me. (for the most part, but obviously I can see only so far away) If i caught someone taping me I would stop and let them know I was not comfortable with it, and hopefully it would end there.
At the Greek last year, I was doing my thing and began hearing some young kids talking about my dancing. I let it go for a song and then I had had enough. I stopped, mid spin, facing them. Their eyes went wide when they realized I was not as "out there" as they had thought. I asked the sportscasters if they were done with the play by play so I could continue enjoying myself, and not have to find a new spot. They apologized and said it was only in good fun, and they liked how much fun I was having. I wasn't a bitch, and they weren't dicks, so that was the end of it. I hope it was a lesson learned for them and their young entourage. Thank goodness no taping was involved.
Am I supposed to stop doing what brings me so much happiness in fear of being ridiculed or taped? Hell no! Am I asking for it? Maybe, but I keep my faith that true fans understand and are happy that I'm enjoying myself and leave it at that.
Why don't the we all get together and start politely asking these video taping tourists to stop doing it when we catch it happening. Who knows, it just might put an end to it.
On a last note, to those who are not familiar with the act of spinning to get naturally high or reach that higher place: PLEASE do not stop spinners to tell them to stop or you might fall down, or get too dizzy. It's completely unnecessary and intruding.
Thanks for letting me share my thoughts!
My two cents worth. (which, it now costs more to make a penny, so I hereby declare that all our $0.02 is now only worth $0.01420)
Anyways, apparently Justin Bieber was at Dicks last night according to Twitter. Somebody mentioned Trey in 03-04 and public celebrity figures compared to everyday folks and their privacy on the web, and I thought of this thread. I have no idea if Bieber was on anything or if he does that at all, but I'd like to think that if he were interested in recreating, a Phish show would be one place he could in public without getting his "heartthrob on drugs" picture taken, ending up on the news. Based on photos it looks like I was pretty close to him, and had no idea. I think that says something positive about the community. I hope he wasn't bothered by his fans, or people wanting to earn cred by getting a pic with/of him. I hope he surrendered to the flow and danced his ass off without caring whether anybody was recording him. A Phish show should be somewhere you can do that; for him or you or me or anybody else.